Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 46 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1792 litres | 1620 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`058 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`620 kg | 1`602 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 650 kg | 456 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |