Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |