Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Peugeot 4007 2007

 
Mitsubishi Outlander
2012 - 2015
Peugeot 4007
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP156 HP
Torque: 380 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds9.9 seconds
Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.47.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1010 km on highway
840 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASXInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Peugeot 4007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.64 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.68 m1.67 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Peugeot 4007, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
986 litres1686 litres
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 290 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 700 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1702`410
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 10 0006400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Outlander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
Peugeot 4007 has
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv