Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs BMW X4 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X4, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW X4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm shorter than the BMW X4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
986 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
BMW X4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 280 litres less trunk space than the BMW X4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X4 (by 414 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.3 metres less than that of the BMW X4, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| BMW X4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than BMW X4, so BMW X4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
BMW X4 has
| |