Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 7 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Audi Q5. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
986 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 320 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 574 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |