Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Outlander torque is 40 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 29 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 185 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |