Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Outlander torque is 60 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 292 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |