Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Honda CR-V) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 29 HP less power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2360 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`810 kg | 1`542 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 558 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |