Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 169 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 233 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 22 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 25 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 603 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
986 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 12 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 9200 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |