Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 124 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 412 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 179 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`435 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |