Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 engine produces 11 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 has 189 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander 2012, so Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |