Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Lexus NX 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Lexus NX is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 91 HP less power than Lexus NX, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Lexus NX. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus NX, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus RX, Lexus GS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Lexus NX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Lexus NX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 501 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 90 litres more trunk space than the Lexus NX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Lexus NX, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`359 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Lexus NX has
| |