Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 80 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |