Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 13 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1640 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 7 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |