Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Renault Koleos 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1640 litres | 1690 litres | |
|
Renault Koleos has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 61 litres less trunk space than the Renault Koleos. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`157 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |