Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai Santa FE) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 421 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 30 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 199 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Hyundai Santa FE are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 585 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1640 litres | 1570 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 108 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |