Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 113 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Stelvio, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Alfa Romeo Stelvio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1640 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 48 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 39 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
| |