Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 103 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 174 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |