Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 146 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 196 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 6 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.9 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda CR-V 2015: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly communicates with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and the electric power steering to maintain full control of the vehicle, good traction and maneuverability in any road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 18 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Used also on Honda Accord | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 589 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 18 200 | 16 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |