Mitsubishi Outlander 2021 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 181 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 245 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Outlander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 331 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2217 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 762 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`355 kg | ~ 2`490 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`775 kg | ~ 1`789 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 580 kg | ~ 701 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |