Mitsubishi Outlander 2021 vs Tesla Model Y 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Tesla Model Y can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, hybrid) | - (electric) | |
| Tesla Model Y is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 181 HP | 204 - 534 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 245 NM | 350 - 527 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 3.7 - 6.9 seconds | |
| In general, Tesla Model Y are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Outlander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | 167 - 172 mm (6.6 - 6.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm shorter than the Tesla Model Y, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 331 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2217 litres | 2158 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 523 litres less trunk space than the Tesla Model Y. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Tesla Model Y, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`355 kg | ~ 2`477 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`775 kg | ~ 1`947 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 580 kg | ~ 530 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 37 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Tesla Model Y has
| |