Mitsubishi Outlander 2021 vs Audi Q5 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 181 HP | 163 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 245 NM | 320 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.3 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.4 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 331 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2217 litres | 1520 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 189 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 697 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`355 | ~ 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 45 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |