Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Outlander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 24 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`390 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |