Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 5.3 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 2.0 - 7.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 216 - 400 mm (8.5 - 15.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`390 | ~ 2`507 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |