Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Seat Leon 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Seat Leon has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Seat Leon can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 110 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 175 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 7.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| In general, Seat Leon are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Outlander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 4.1 - 6.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Leon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 15 cm longer than the Seat Leon, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 587 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Leon. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`390 kg | ~ 1`893 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`710 kg | ~ 1`264 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 680 kg | ~ 629 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than Seat Leon. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Seat Leon has
| |