Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 240 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 4.9 - 6.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 204 - 210 mm (8 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 31 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`390 | ~ 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |