Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Honda Civic 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda Civic has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Civic can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 99 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 8.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 5.1 - 7.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 44 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1352 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 63 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 250 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`390 | ~ 1`756 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda Civic has
| |