Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Citroen C5 Aircross has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Citroen C5 Aircross can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, hybrid) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Citroen C5 Aircross is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 131 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 8.2 - 10.6 seconds | |
| In general, Citroen C5 Aircross are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Outlander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 1.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C5 Aircross. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 186 - 230 mm (7.3 - 9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm longer than the Citroen C5 Aircross, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 Aircross (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`390 kg | ~ 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`710 kg | ~ 1`492 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 680 kg | ~ 508 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Citroen C5 Aircross. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |