Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Captiva can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, hybrid) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1081 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`390 | ~ 2`055 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |