Mitsubishi Outlander 2018 vs Audi Q5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Audi Q5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi Q5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Audi Q5 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 150 HP | 150 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 211 NM | 320 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | 5.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 8.7 | 5.2 - 7.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 31 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`390 | ~ 2`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |