Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 230 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.2 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Outlander are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Qashqai. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.4 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 34 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1691 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 364 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`216 kg | ~ 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`564 kg | ~ 1`453 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 652 kg | ~ 532 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |