Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 230 HP | 150 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 226 - 422 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.2 seconds | 9.5 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.4 | 6.3 - 10.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Santa FE. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Hyundai Santa FE are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 2274 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 195 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 583 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`216 | ~ 2`516 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |