Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 201 HP | 150 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 303 NM | 190 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 12.3 seconds | 10 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.1 | 9.1 - 10.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 125 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 753 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`041 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |