Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 201 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 303 NM | 176 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 12.3 seconds | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.1 | 7.5 - 10.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2005, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 has 139 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2005. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`041 | ~ 2`331 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |