Mitsubishi Outlander 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 310 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 10.6 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1691 litres | 1532 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 159 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`331 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`665 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 666 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |