Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 276 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 337 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |