Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, a Mitsubishi Outlander with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 182 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 123 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |