Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, a Mitsubishi Outlander with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 1053 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1792 litres | 2008 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`159 kg | ~ 2`133 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`573 kg | ~ 1`573 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 586 kg | ~ 560 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |