Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 150 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 233 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1773 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 168 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`146 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |