Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 150 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 233 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1773 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 168 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`146 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |