Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 266 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |