Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Kia Sorento 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 150 - 197 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 225 - 436 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 9.7 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 8.8 | |
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Sorento. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Sorento, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 771 litres | 515 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | no data | |
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Outlander has 256 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sorento. The Kia Sorento may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Sorento. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`510 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 9200 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |