Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 120 - 188 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 9.6 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.7 - 10.6 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 589 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1669 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 39 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 123 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.3 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 14 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |