Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 208 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.7 - 10.6 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 2`059 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |