Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Opel Corsa 1996

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Opel Corsa
1996 - 1997
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP60 HP
Torque: 123 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.2 seconds16.5 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 8 HP more power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Opel Corsa. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.15.3
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
Opel Corsa gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m3.73 m
Width: 1.68 m1.61 m
Height: 1.38 m1.42 m
Mitsubishi Lancer is larger, but slightly lower.
Mitsubishi Lancer is 55 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1050 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0201`410
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • more power
Opel Corsa has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv