Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Mazda 3 2007

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Mazda 3
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 68 HP143 HP
Torque: 123 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 75 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 237 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.0
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years5 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.49 m
Width: 1.68 m1.76 m
Height: 1.38 m1.47 m
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller.
Mitsubishi Lancer is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0201`925
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data2600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv