Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 engine produces 65 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, whereas torque is 59 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer 1996. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | Used also on Mitsubishi Colt | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`045 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |