Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, but torque is 4 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`025 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |