Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Mitsubishi Lancer
1996 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 113 HP75 HP
Torque: 137 NM108 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds12.5 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 engine produces 38 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer 1996. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
590 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 15 years27 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi CarismaUsed also on Mitsubishi Colt
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.30 m
Width: 1.68 m1.69 m
Height: 1.38 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`0051`050
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv