Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 167 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 216 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`005 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |