Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 and Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 27 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |