Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 86 HP | |
Torque: | 108 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.9 | |
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 27 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Colt | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer and Toyota Corolla are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |